InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 1853
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/19/2002

Re: mas post# 15448

Sunday, 01/23/2005 11:23:47 AM

Sunday, January 23, 2005 11:23:47 AM

Post# of 151741
Absolutely superb and Conroe should be a 64 bit 4-issue 4Mb 65nm monster derivative with probably another FP unit. Intel would have been screwed in the future without the P-M design although P4 has served them well when PIII stumbled. Tag team action obviously wink.


And why stop with Conroe? Go even further..... Let's say, for example, what do you suppose the result might be.... hypothetically, if intel took the PM core design concept, and in the future, dumped the P4 design, and instead, spread the PM design across the entire product line? That would be a pretty smart thing to do, wouldn't it?

Just speculation, of course wink
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent INTC News