InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 1789
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/12/2009

Re: drkazmd65 post# 217737

Monday, 07/05/2010 6:10:59 PM

Monday, July 05, 2010 6:10:59 PM

Post# of 734772
Just a simple point, If JP is making 2B. a month then why settle till they absolutely have to? I think anyone in this position would stall, agree? Settlement must prove to be less costly, but right now they are making money and the threat of anything else is still cost effiicient(their profits outway liabilities)maybe?
Just simplifying this thought and ofcoarse, the threat from DOJ,UST,Susman & Solomon, along with our Good Judge with looming decisions that have to be made will obviously tip the scales tremendously in the EC's favor but still may come down to, profits vs. liabilities.
I am also somewhat stuck on the idea of who would take some of the heat for JP because most of these folks have layers of people who may become expendable during any finger pointing thus insulating themselves from any wrong doing, maybe?

All this is speculation and in my opinion that has no credibility(as I am not a legal eagle) so just getting some thoughts down on the board and quite possibly repeating other folks thoughts. I have read so many posts on WAMUQ that I sometimes forget who said what or what was said from day to day. Maybe I just sit quietly and wait for some form of resolution as in Diamonds 2x's or Bop's 40+(which I like better)!

Thanks to all who truly have whats best for all at heart for they serve the community!

imo
jimmy
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News