InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[tucker]

loophole was right as to what the court ruled, but I could never understand how the court reversed as to validity and affirmed as to the jury's finding of no infringment. Since the court ruled that the question of validity was a "law question" for the judge to decide and the infringment was a fact question, then since the jury had answered both against Idcc, how could the jury be expected to answer other than "no infringment" and declare something that was invalid could be infringed!! The court should have remanded for a new trial on the fact question of infringment.

I said Lynn was wrong, Batts was out of it and Sanders had just gotten too old and I now believe that Luckern also was just wrong and the appellate court will reverse! Just my opinion. Tucker