InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 161
Posts 5310
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/24/2009

Re: Jestiron post# 215379

Friday, 06/25/2010 11:34:37 AM

Friday, June 25, 2010 11:34:37 AM

Post# of 735099

Jestron, are you sure?

http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/takings.htm
"The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eminent_domain#History
"the Fifth Amendment's Taking or Just Compensation clause "

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/bc/Amendment_5_Annot.pdf
pdf page 3
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise
infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of
a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval
forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War
or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same
offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be
compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself,
nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process
of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."



FOURTH AMENDMENT everyone!!! Not the 5th!!!
Agree....the govt may have the "right" to seize as th Judge confirmed in that case, but that cannot be done without compensation, which is the whole point of the 4th Amendment!

You take, you pay!

jest

PS...that correction was not aimed at you Lawrence. LOL

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News