InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 47
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/07/2010

Re: Lawrence 147 post# 214599

Tuesday, 06/22/2010 2:38:21 PM

Tuesday, June 22, 2010 2:38:21 PM

Post# of 736072
Hi Lawrence,

you are right, she had no chance to rule.

And my impression on the last hearing was that Nelson didnt know

whether to push or to step back.

I think you need a lot of self confidence to decide in court in

seconds what is your next step.

Anyway Nelson could have pointed out that Weil implicated that

they only will give to the EC what they find appropriate with

respect to the global settlement.

Also Nelson should have foreseen this tactics and could have been

prepared better.

But still he does a great job no question to that.


If you look at the 30th, the timespan until 8th of July will be to

short for the EC to determine what quality the data has.

I doubt at least.

Anyway again I have no idea what Rosen has won and what are his

next steps.

But I´m pretty sure he will be able to delay the examiner

decision after the 8th of July and maybe he hopes that in the

meantime he can go on with the DS.

But the judge made clear that there never will be a POR or DS

without numbers that make sense so .....

...it's going to stay thrilling
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News