Its yet another SFMI PR...
And, we know they aren't overly concerned with any PR being precise or factual... as they are written with a design like swiss cheese, and always rife with weasel words that could have them mean almost anything.
It could mean, for instance, that the entire value of "production" just met the amount of $ owed for "rent"... so "production" covered "rent"... just nothing else. They could be losing $ hand over fist and still make that claim. It wouldn't be valid in a proper accounting sense, of course... but, of course, they'd also be happy to state it as they have and then allow you to assume that is what it meant... Etc.
When will you see them writing PR that means what it says, and says what it means... without weasel words ? They'd obviously rather stick to being as "flexible" in their use of language as possible...