InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 960
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/09/2006

Re: None

Monday, 06/07/2010 12:42:01 PM

Monday, June 07, 2010 12:42:01 PM

Post# of 735097
What I don't understand, if Susman is attempting to maximize assets and Weil is not, shouldn't Weil be repalced by Susman, so the estate doesn't have to waste all Weil's legal fees? If Weil wants to represent JPM and fight against having over certain documents, so be it, but shouldn't JPM pay for that defense, not WMI?
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News