InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 46
Posts 5000
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/16/2008

Re: 65cuda post# 34784

Sunday, 06/06/2010 10:54:00 AM

Sunday, June 06, 2010 10:54:00 AM

Post# of 83075
That's a very interesting perspective Cuda. One thing I would like to know is the amount of pressure Paramount Chiefs put on the company to produce. They would not sign concessions to a company that was not going to produce. I believe there has to be some level of competition for concessions so wouldn't the P.C.'s want to select a company that will bring them the most income? I realize we are feeding workers and making improvements to their infrastructure but wouldn't any company offer those things if that is the way business is done there?

As I said previously I am in complete agreement with eyeamgame's comments. I find it inconceivable that mining operations were a dismal failure this season. We know that shareholders' comments don't concern this management team but it seems to me that P.C.'s would be pressuring the company to produce as it lines their pockets. Perhaps the P.C.'s would look the other way for one year but it is my opinion that they will turn up the heat on this company quickly if poor results continue. Maybe the P.C.'s see more value in the agriculture and husbandry side of the business...who knows. I would sure like to hear the comments of anyone who may have talked to John about the Paramount Chiefs.

Gritting my teeth waiting to see the O/S June 30. Hoping for a miracle by July 15.