I often question whether it is reading or understanding that is the challenge for Laidlaw investors. Assuming you spent the time to read their testimony, do you honestly believe that Mel and Bill’s testimony is fabricated? If you believe it is, then why not directly challenge it? Or is it that you can't? Perhaps it’s just the reality of it all that is just to difficult for Laidlaw investors to accept. Oh well, at least you can’t claim you weren’t given all the facts.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.