Friday, January 07, 2005 11:43:59 PM
Whether PWTC's battery is revolutionary or just evolutionary will be a judgment call or just semantics. Having to compete sounds good to me because it would mean having produced a battery to enter into the competition.
The risk I see is not that PWTC's battery would lose a competition but that it will never be able to compete because it never gets built and marketed. And the reason for that would be that new CEO follows LB's practice of making wild claims and announcing partnerships that never really happen.
Caradoc
PS: Quote from "Gems in the Dust": "Hey, this structure is applicable to any battery chemistry."
http://www.manufacturingcenter.com/dfx/archives/0401/0401yr.asp
FEATURED Nightfood Signs Letter of Intent to Acquire Los Angeles Cooking School, Integrating Automation and Robotics with World-Class Culinary Training • Oct 1, 2024 8:30 AM
FEATURED ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) To Commence Trading Today • Oct 1, 2024 7:00 AM
Integrated Ventures, Inc Reports Total 2024 Revenues Of $5,863,935 vs $3,862,849 for 2023. • INTV • Oct 1, 2024 9:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp secures loi for launching tailings reprocessing business in Arequipa, Peru • ELMGF • Oct 1, 2024 6:38 AM
BARRON'S COVE to Premier at the Hamptons International Film Festival • APHP • Sep 30, 2024 2:56 PM
Lingerie Fighting Championships Signs Broadcast Deal With Maybacks Global Entertainment • BOTY • Sep 26, 2024 9:00 AM