InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 380
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/16/2009

Re: barefoot123 post# 196583

Sunday, 05/09/2010 6:51:28 PM

Sunday, May 09, 2010 6:51:28 PM

Post# of 735710
I guess what really throws me is the “only” in would “only” benefit
future parties, but not benefit the parties in this case........", because if the future parties she is referring to are the shareholders and the “parties in this case” are the ones that hired Weil, then it does not make sense, because if the future parties are taken care of then the parties in this case will also be taken care of in full, if in fact a settlement trickles down to commons.

"..........I don’t think it is fair to the creditors in this case, to be saddled with the costs of an investigation into systemic problems that would only benefit
future parties, but not benefit the parties in this case........"
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News