CSG Inc. (fka CYSG)

[seeclear]

'fenian32' .."Not exactly true!"...The CD's have been in play snce 2004/5...Why did they wait two years to start the pr's???..In truth CYSG was **quite obviously** trying to stay way way below the radar!!! ...It was only when it was made public that they had 104 employees instead of the 21 they claimed and the cat was coming out of the bag and the pps started moving..that the current activity came into play!!..So you may have to *re-think* your hypothesis!...I am under a multi directional haze but do not believe the action we see can be very simply explained!..One part of the explanation may be that CYSG was seriously attempting to await the expiry of the "pre and from 2005' CD's'" and thier five year maturity! Without any volume to sell into... the CD's would have harmlessly expired and CYSG would not have had to fulfill their obligations to issue additional shares and fufill the legal and binding obligations to the CD's and thier holders (Midmark and Friends) with such volume, taking once again note that the the collateral behind the CD's are there collective holdings and patents of the "there and shortly after legally entwined" CYSG Group..and CYSG Group/Inc..If you have noted their prior pps to.. and an almost compulsive need to ***maintain*** an average of @.0005..I have not a good reason for this but the action seems magnetic and systematically induced. Taking note that now CYSG is coming to life under the jurisdiction of this final round of *collective* CD's (There are other incoming infrequent CD's..but these can easily be taken care of or may not have merit or enforcement if the CYSG is acquired in conjuction with a very low pps!!! -Seabiscuit your opinion on this aspect would be nice!)..This makes it most bearable if the potentially authorised pps stay at a minimum both for thier dilutive restraints and the possibility of a potential buyback or acquisition by some other entity such as DNPI..."Do not forget my position of being appropriately hazy"...There are still other scenarios if you combine stealth accumulation of shares under the guise of dilution and by multiple parties and mutually beneficially shorting??....You must admit there is a lot of shares that are going 'off board' in my opinion anyhow???....In essence you are on the right track...SC.