InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,615.35
(
0.55%
)
US TECH 100
19,804.00
(
0.64%
)
Dow Jones
40,000.90
(
0.62%
)
Brent Oil
84.57
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
60,048.79
(
1.38%
)
Post# of 704570
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

alien-IQ

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 60
Posts 23840
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/30/2008

alien-IQ

Re: -blklabs- post# 277444

Tuesday, 04/27/2010 11:47:04 AM

Tuesday, April 27, 2010 11:47:04 AM

Post# of 704570
So let me see if I understand this correctly: Bringing fraud charges against a bank whom has long been know to have been involved in fraud is a congressional stunt to appear authoritative?

While that may be one way to look at it, is it not possible that perhaps, maybe just maybe...fraud charges for fraud are warranted?

"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth is revolutionary" George Orwell

"The only thing worth globalizing is dissent." Arundhati Roy

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up