Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[Jetmek_03052]

Investinginstockmarket,

You are inventing an issue which doesn't exist. I am not manipulating anything. I view this company for what it is; a company that currently has no PUBLICLY stated revenue....just forward looking, ROSY predictions. From one of which is a company that hasn't even been DEVELOPED or LAUNCHED yet (iPayu).

Again, you are A-B-S-O-L-U-T-E-L-Y incorrect. One doesn't need a law school degree to read the SEC regulations that clearly state that officers of a company are required to submit SPEARATE FORMS (SEC Forms 3, 4, or 5) to show their stock ownership position.

"Form 3 is redundant"???? HA! Not according to the published rules and regulations of the SEC.

My motivation? Simply to see the truth come out. To find out WHY Linda is apparently not following the rules of the SEC. To find out her EXACT stock ownership. To have it LEGALLY stated that she still owns all her shares and has not been selling.

Maybe people here should examine your IRP (posted on yur BIO page) and find out why your so interested in seeing this stock price rise, no matter if they skirt the rules or not.

What is YOUR motivation here?

Please fill the board in on how you received your shares.

I have nothing to hide here. Why is (apparently) Linda refusing to comply with the stated rules and regulations of the SEC?

Ask yourself these questions.

Has Linda been awarded shares? Yes! We know this through the "small print" (as you pointed out) in the 10Q's and10K's that have been published.

Does the SEC require SEPARATE FORMS 3, 4 or 5 be filed to show the exact number of shares owned? ABSOLUTELY. One only has to go to the SEC website to see that that is undeniably true. Yes. It is redundant but that's the rules. Deal with it.

WHY has Linda chosen not to publicly file these required forms?