InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 28
Posts 373
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/26/2009

Re: Lawrence 147 post# 184545

Saturday, 04/03/2010 3:51:01 PM

Saturday, April 03, 2010 3:51:01 PM

Post# of 729851
Lawrence 147 -

Below is a post made by me yesterday.

I and my shares woud like to see all of the positive things in favor of WAMUQ come to pass, but the court doesn't follow the simple way that all of us would take to resolve this issue. Also, I will be happy to have you change my mind on 'Fraudulent Conveyance'. Please point me in the direction of your information on the subject. Thanks!

In addition, the latest post at ghostofwamu.com is in essence a rebuttal by FDIC-Receiver against a filing of the WMI Creditor's Committee that many would think should have been in BK court. It almost sounds like a charge of fraud but is not. The FDIC-Receiver simply states that the Creditors of WMI do not have the same rights as the debtors. IMO EOM

Fraudulent Conveyance -

More in formation at the link below.

I am not saying that Fraudulent Conveyance will not be heard in the BK, I am saying that no one has filed Fraudulent Conveyance for the judge to consider. It has been 18 months so far. There must be a reason. EOM

http://www.caddenfuller.com/CM/Articles/Articles38.asp
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News