appears you have lots of unanswered questions yourself!!
you write:
"who cares"......
We the shareholders do!!
you write:
"There is no evidence the Nevada shell company owned by
shareholders was ever merged with any other company.".....
why does the OSC referance SULJA NEVADA in their filings than... APPEARS INDEED WE HAVE LEGAL REPRESENTAION AND SULJA NEVADA EXISTS, CONTRARY TO THOSE WHO ARE OUT TO DECIEVE THE PUBLIC
"AND WHEREAS counsel for Sam Sulja, Steve Sulja and Sulja Nevada confirmed in advance that he would not be attending the March 4, 2010, pre-hearing conference;"
www.osc.gov.on.ca/en/Proceedings_rad_20100304_sulja.htm
you write:
"but which Sulja company did they sell those assets to?".....
follow the pattern not very difficult the SAMS trasaction was PR'D by SLJB the nevada shell company you describe and E&Y even pr'd the transaction in their 4th qtr 2006 advisory and to top that mario moretto confirmed the transaction in a official press release. "Mario Moretto, President of Sam Building Materials, agreed with Sulja Bros. and stated, "Since October 2nd, we have been working under the Sulja banner. The purchase was completed and the documents are with our lawyers. I have spoken to no one from the Windsor Star, and I am uncertain to where they are getting their inaccurate information from. I want to state again that the deal has been finalized and everyone is very pleased with the result."
you write:
"According to the land title records for the Sulja property in Harrow and the SAM property on County Road 17, none of the lands changed title. John Sulja Sr. is still the principal owner of the former lumberyard property near Harrow."
That's correct..the buyout was for the business not the property, you cannot buy the property when its been leased to you by a 3rd party.HELLO!! "The take over was seamless and everyone is happy with it. "We have been conducting business normally and without hindrance since October. We plan on continuing as such and on expanding our business despite efforts of those outside our organization trying to derail our efforts for reasons unknown to us," the spokesperson said."
you write:
"It's not proven yet, but most likely they also sold those assets to Vucicevich's Sulja Building Supplies"
just like the OSC ALLEGATIONS and nothing has been proven on the part of the OSC
you write:
"You cannot buy a 2x4, box of nails or a bag of cement from a company in the Windsor and Essex County area with a Sulja name on the bill."
Thats about the only correct statement you made in your entire post, because at one point you say "john sulja sold sulja building supplies accounts payable and receivable to another Ontario incorporated company, Sulja Building Supplies, set up by Vucicevich. Sulja Building Supplies went into receivership." which was the closing out of the old corp, which was being rolled into new corp. If you recall the expansion name was not under the SULJA BANNER, it was totally different PR'D by Steve. The ultimate goal was not to be a a mom and pop hardware retailer but a global commodities trading company IE:International Trading, which they were setting out to do long before the CTO trading order.
The OSC HAS SHOWED US NO PROOF TO THEIR ALLEGATIONS. LET'S SEE WHAT THEY HAVE BEFORE ANYONE SHOULD CONSIDER WRITING OFF ANY SHARE IN SLJB, AS HAS BEEN SUGGESTED BY OTHERS. PATIENCE!!
