InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 1541
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/27/2007

Re: silentman post# 9053

Thursday, 03/25/2010 2:04:20 PM

Thursday, March 25, 2010 2:04:20 PM

Post# of 20617
Hey sm, sorry it took so long to reply, but I did do some digging. As of 3/23.. the claim/counterclaim of the "parties" I fore-mentioned has been requested to go to a JURY TRIAL.

http://stashbox.org/835086/JUNP%20Case.pdf

"The agreements and instruments plaintiffs seek to enforce are illegal as written;
under plaintiffs’ interpretation, these agreements and instruments require the parties to engage in conduct that is illegal; and plaintiffs’ attempts at enforcing these agreements and instruments are
aimed at compelling Juniper to engage in illegal activities and to assist and aid abet plaintiffs’
own illegal activities..."


BEST! part IMO... expose them JUNP.

I think JUNP has a winning "counter-claim" that cites NUMEROUS instances of the plaintiff's "unscrupulous" practices(BREACH! of contract). Yep, I want the JURY to hear allllll about it. ;)

GLTY!! and ALL!

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.