InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 659
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/26/2006

Re: cmayden443 post# 49046

Saturday, 03/20/2010 5:31:27 PM

Saturday, March 20, 2010 5:31:27 PM

Post# of 56275
It's always the short-sellers, isn't it. Ever figured that short sellers would crash and burn if the company did the right things and acted in the best interest of the shareholder? Short selling is perfectly legal and an important tool to keep the markets in equilibrium, but I am sure you'll invoke the pupmers trump card soon: the naked short.

If you were to grade management's performance here, could you honestly say they deserve anything near to an "A"?

-Gagged transfer agent
-Lack of finanial transparency (former OTC BB stock droppng to the pinks)
-History of filing 'non-reliance' statements for initial errors in financial reporting (see 8-k filed for EVLN this week) EBOF had its fair share of those
-Big mess with the current dividends
-Hundred's of millions of shareholder value lost (see retained earnings
-Reverse split into a buy-back announcement
-Entering into NDAs with selected shareholders while reportedly allowing them to trade on insider information but then suing said shareholder
-Defaulting on most of their credit lines in the past
-Missed on most deadlines ever PRed
-Being sued by many former business partners on ventures that went sour

I can go on and on. What are your arguments pro management?