NanoTech Gaming Inc (NTGL)

[DueDillinger]

Where did I ever write that you are an 'idiot for trying'?

In 1609, I simply asked in response to your somewhat hypeful post: "What credible fund buys subpenny stocks?".

You identified the fund, and I wrote this:

L- So how many non-reporting pink sheet stocks are there in Putnam's OTC & Emerging Growth Fund. You can find a complete listing here:

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/703969/000092881604000955/otc1.txt

I'll save you the trouble, though. The answer is that there are no non-reporting pink sheet stocks in the fund's portfolio.
Would you like to try again?

No insult, nothing personal, just a link to a shareholders report on the fund in question, verifying that they do not invest in subpenny trash. You replied with a post full of insult and innuendo, as well as an implicit threat for which you later apologized.

My reply had not a single word of insult directed to you personally:

It's not what OTC means to me, IL, but rather what it means to the fund. There it definitely does not mean non-reporting pink sheet trash.

I'm going to ignore your ad hominem argument. It's not about me, and if you continue to attempt to make it about me I'll have your posts removed. I simply post in counterpoint to hype and lies.

To suggest that a fund such as Putnam OTC and Emerging Growth would even consider CTKH for a New York minute is either an act of hype or a sail on that ol' Egyptian river.

Yet you retort with lies that I called you an idiot and attacked you; and continue an ad hominem argument that ignores the point of all this where I started...that legitimate funds will not consider investing in non-reporting pink sheet trash.

Is the light of reality so painful for you that you must lash out at someone who turns it on?