InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,344.16
(
0.47%
)
US TECH 100
18,024.00
(
0.56%
)
Dow Jones
39,497.54
(
0.13%
)
Brent Oil
79.49
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
61,061.81
(
0.19%
)
Post# of 17499
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

uhlmant

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 29
Posts 3396
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 10/03/2007

uhlmant

Re: daktok post# 11125

Wednesday, 03/17/2010 11:55:24 AM

Wednesday, March 17, 2010 11:55:24 AM

Post# of 17499
I know that...I just wanted him to say as such. We went back and forth in about 10 emails. I just wanted him to say it came from a confidential source vs. he pulled it out of his arse

As far as I know, his article is the origin of the 30B
If assets > L by 30B why create a new company? Just pay everyone and give common holders a s**t load of cash.

If A>L by 30B but the assets are illquid than shouldn't common sholders be the largest beneficiary of LAMCO?

just thinking aloud
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up