I agree. Like I have said, there are 2 camps right now, those saying this was a scam and those saying it was a sting. While I'm not really a Tyler fan, 2 things are in their favor, (1) their lawsuits make reasonable sense, the average person can understand the suits and (2) they don't use others to promote rumors, theories, conspiraces, far fetched ideas. Just think, does it make sense to be suing an agency that is under the umbrella of the gov't while asking other agencies of that same gov't to aid in a sting. Last I knew, the gov't was a pretty collusive entity protecting their own, especially if national interest were at stake. That would be like someone asking me to rat out my brother if he was doing something bad and I was a participant, directly or indirectly, in his bad action.
Reading the Hodges' lawsuit is like reading something out of a Clancy novel especially when you throw in the endorsement of Christopher Story and his World reports. Then you have plaintiffs, who in poor judgement, threw out more fuel for the wild fire only to try to have it excused by a simple "sorry" from the acting/representing attorney. In the legal world there are simple rules of etiquette to follow and obviously someone forgot their manners.
While I am a shareholder, that doesn't mean I'm a dummy. I still have the responsibility to look at all the facts and the like on this situation to draw the most reasonable conclusion and unfortunately the sting theory just doesn't have enough concrete evidence to prove otherwise, please prove me wrong but with all the feeble attempts to date, it probably will not happen. I am willing to wait for the discovery process as I am sure everyone is to see the smoking gun(s).
AI
