Wednesday, February 24, 2010 1:55:53 PM
1) Why bother raising $5,000,000 when you could potentially be worth $200,000,000 in a couple months?
2) Additionally, why bother paying back $100,000 loan with stock at such a discount? Who was the loan to? Why couldn't the payback be extended until the stock is at a much higher valuation?
3) When and how did Alliance Acquisitions acquire a stake in Imaging3? Were they a part of the 107,000,000 share offering last year?
4) If you truly believe Imaging3 will succeed soon, why not wait to leverage that success in your fund raising effort for the new (not really new) venture?
5) Why is the prospectus so focused on what they achieved with the stock price of their companies rather than what they achieved in terms of actual profitability?
I am hopeful there are good answers to these questions so that such valid concerns (and specifically my posting them although they have been posted by others) do not affect the stock price.
Can someone please get Mike Nessen or Dean to answer these questions soon? There is a lot about this that defies logic as well sound management/PR of a publicly traded company. The perception alone even if there is no wrongdoing is very bothersome.
North Bay Resources Announces Mt. Vernon Gold Mine Bulk Sample, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Sep 11, 2024 9:15 AM
One World Products Issues Shareholder Update Letter • OWPC • Sep 11, 2024 7:27 AM
Kona Gold Beverage Inc. Reports $1.225 Million in Revenue and $133,000 Net Profit for the Quarter • KGKG • Sep 10, 2024 1:30 PM
Element79 Gold Corp Announces 2024 Clover Work Plans & Nevada Portfolio Updates • ELMGF • Sep 10, 2024 11:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Inc. Completes Major Step on Uplist Journey by Closing Strategic All-Stock Acquisition of CarryoutSupplies.com • NGTF • Sep 10, 2024 8:15 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Announces Sale of 100% Interest in Elder Creek, North Mill Creek, and Elephant Projects to 1472886 B.C. Ltd. • ELEM • Sep 9, 2024 9:34 AM