InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 56
Posts 967
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/13/2009

Re: JohnnyWinter post# 147915

Friday, 02/05/2010 5:13:28 PM

Friday, February 05, 2010 5:13:28 PM

Post# of 735746
Here we go again, lol.

Nice try with the attempted legal interpretation but that doesn't apply. We're talking about a parent company NOT being liable for its subsidiary (the separate company) under the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil. The NOL issue has nothing to do with this and your theory is inapplicable here.

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piercing_the_corporate_veil




MAKINGMOVES

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News