InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 3285
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/13/2009

Re: Artguy post# 18251

Thursday, 02/04/2010 6:48:22 PM

Thursday, February 04, 2010 6:48:22 PM

Post# of 35337

There have been enough projects, potentials, interest, etc. that didn't pan out to warrant a lot of skepticism, but you take it to another level when you decide which ones were 'lies.' I don't see how you can say that if you don't know all the facts, many of which simply can't be divulged



I agree Artguy, none of them are probably outright lies. I honestly believe that Jim believed everything that he has said over the years. The problem is there are just so many that it has become very hard to believe anything that comes from Jim any longer. Personally I take anything new that comes from management with a grain of salt and hope that for once something pans out. It has been a very long and painful journey for all of us here including the Gleasmans. I believe that to be true even of the most outspoken "cheerleaders". You would have had to had a lobotomy to not have been discouraged at some point over the years, they just may not want to admit it publically.


Far too many executives have become more concerned with the "four P's" - pay, perks, power and prestige - rather than making profits for shareholders.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.