InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[ziploc_1]

Jiff; my take on that is that the judge was asking whether the settlement documents would have an impact on a third party. When Idcc said no, it was because they were convinced the 1999 contract with Nok definitively established that Ericy was a trigger and that whatever rates Ericy paid would be the rates that Nok would pay, regardless of what was in the documents. They felt it was a cut and dried issue.