maybe in some bizzare theoritcal way it does? This IS CMKX afterall.
Indeed it is CMKX; and "bizarre" and "theoritcal" or something close to theoretical, if that is what you are trying to convey and happen to be a Sterling spec-o-lation passed-off-as-theory buff, may well be connected to CMKX by virtue of the definition of the terms.
While I find that such questions are just silly, perhaps I'm not enlightened enough to see the bizarre theory behind them.
Nor do I think the great guru Sterling's latest lame attempt to revive the bizarre 8-per-cent "theory" is anything other than silly.
Then again, I don't think D. Roger Glenn can walk on water or sits on the right-hand side of anyone of regulatory significance, let alone religious significance.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.