A.I.M. Users Bulletin Board

[karw]

I checked it for PP in my spreadsheet: you get the same hold zones as with AIM, the only change is the 'moving' PC or CV.

I am not sure if a safe of 10% and minimal transaction size of 5%
is optimal. It could be that 5%,10% or 7.5%,7.5% is more attractive.

PC will grow yearly with 9% and it could be that you want to maximize the number of transactions.

For each asset class the hold zone has to be different, dependent on the volatility of that asset class.

A zigzag analysis is needed then on the major asset classes.

Kind Regards,K