InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 71
Posts 3317
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 09/29/2009

Re: maone15 post# 5981

Wednesday, 12/16/2009 8:21:58 PM

Wednesday, December 16, 2009 8:21:58 PM

Post# of 16707
I thought three points made in the article were pretty valid on the surface:

1. It looks and feels like a SPNG stock, especially being right on the heels of that fiasco.

2. Why would Skymark promote a stock and compare it to SPNG, which tanked almost overnight?

3. Skymark gets paid $5,000/month for their research and promotion.


Point 1 and 2 don't really bother me. I think most who followed SPNG know the answers to those. The 3rd point is a bit disconcerting. But to be honest, if they keep their track record intact, I don't care how much anyone pays them so long as they pick right. Also, it should probably be noted that it is a far cry from "pumping stocks." We pay a monthly fee to them to give us recommendations and updates and answer questions when we have them.