InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 251930
Next 10
Followers 56
Posts 1150
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/12/2005

Re: poorgradstudent post# 86814

Monday, 11/30/2009 10:24:50 PM

Monday, November 30, 2009 10:24:50 PM

Post# of 251930

So it is reasonable to ask what real predictive value IVUS provides in translating phase 2 data to phase 3 mortality data.



There is no evidence CETP inhibition works except by raising HDL, which it does by preventing HDL from offloading (not exactly a sound approach). Any CETPi Phase II program has to, at a minimum, provide you a reason to go forward AND some guidance as to how to design and power the trial. The Phase II trial run does neither.

So what if a mobidity/mortality/RLT/IVUS study costs a lot and takes a long time? Better to do that then waste hundreds of millions on a Phase III that will duplicate the failures of the JTT and PFE drugs.

Peter, you're right lipid stool endpoints are not validated. But if you are designing a drug to effect RLT, you'd better have some data somewhere that lipids are being transported out of the body. Stool studies give you at least that.

Unless otherwise indicated, this is the personal viewpoint of David Miller and not necessarily that of Biotech Stock Research, LLC

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.