InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 508
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/10/2003

Re: DRCAL post# 18476

Sunday, 10/24/2004 10:06:17 AM

Sunday, October 24, 2004 10:06:17 AM

Post# of 82595
DRCAL - Thanks. I know that makes sense. It would also make sense that some drug co. would like to own the proprietary science and pending patents now owned exclusively by DNAP. Is this what the europe connection is all about OR is this a play by DNAP to 'encourage' interest by a US co. to look at the above scenerio?

Unlike you, I don't have any experience in this area and I just have to rely on gut feelings. As I've said before, there's just something not quite right here and I don't know what it is. It would appear to me that in any other aspect of business if there were as many positive things going on in one company then the pps would reflect those positives. (understanding the import of revenues relating to long term pps) Here, tho, every good PR is followed by a drop in pps. (ie. "No good thing goes unpunished"??)

Again, thanks for the help. I'm here for the long haul but would rather this happen sooner than later.

I enjoy all info both positive and negative. It's not difficult to seperate the wheat from the chaf.

GL2USALL,

Dick