e-shute, I can't help you on that,
I do not file content into "positive" "negative" "hypster" "basher" camps.
My content reflects my opinion, which has been for some time, that google eyed notions of ubiquity are for the birds, doom-and-gloom notions of crash-and-burn are a real possibility, but in either event Wave has eeeked out an important space, one which they have demonstrated zero proficiency in exploiting.
On eeking out space I give Wave a 8.
On exploiting anything eeked or otherwise I give them a 1.
On important tech for TCG efforts I again give them an 7.
On strength of patents etc I give them a 6.
On strength of finances I give them a 2.
On character of management I give them a 3.
On quality of management I give them a 5.
On vision I give them a 7.
On competition (does it exist, do they understand it) I give them a 2.
I like to think my posts reflect my opinions.
So you tell me, was it a "positive" post? (I'm with the challenger on this one during this season; I don't see the value of labels).
Regards,
Dig Space.
The above content is my opinion.