DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[frogdreaming]

bag8ger, It is irrelevant. I offered my personal interpretation of events as a basis for my motivation, not for argument. That you disagree with them is given, since you obviously are not motivated in the same way.

I am not trying to convince anyone that my interpretation is correct. I am merely pointing out the evidence as it stands. You have every right to assume that some complex set of events unfolded behind the scenes in a manner that not only made the warrants untenable but also prevented any explanation from being given. Help yourself.

I chose to interpret the evidence as it appears (Occam's razor, and all that).

I owe you no list of events. One lie is sufficient to qualify as a liar. Although there have been many other questionable interludes. The nefarious 'loan' and it's extraordinary pay back terms, the Tropical Genomics relationship, the performance bonuses, to name just a few. No...don't bother, I know you have 'explanations and hand waving' to cover all of them. It's OK, these are my interpretations, and they are not presented for argument.

My motives are constantly being questioned here, and I am only addressing that topic. I don't ask for agreement, nor do I wish to rehash any of these old topics.

What I would prefer to do is move on to the next topic. So, having said that, do you have an opinion on my question from the first post in this thread about the tenuous nature of the Biofrontera deal as it relates to the present pps?

regards,
frog