Biotech Values

[wallstarb]

We are talking about something different - they mentioned in an earlier PR that a patient had shown a PR as per recist (this was back in May) and that person was not confirmed because he dropped out. And back then pgs or dew mentioned that the whole study and company was a scam because they dared mention recist PR in the release meaning that the tumor shrank a certain size/volume that would have qualified as a RECIST response IF it were confirmed. And that's the same thing they are still dogging.

I know what a CR is - I am certain they do as well.