InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 253280
Next 10
Followers 61
Posts 11586
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/16/2006

Re: wallstarb post# 84672

Wednesday, 10/07/2009 6:39:40 PM

Wednesday, October 07, 2009 6:39:40 PM

Post# of 253280
Wallstarb, PR

You wrote: >Also with THLD we'll know a lot more in a few months and I agree that when they mention initial recist PR's its misleading - but imo it's not their intention to be disingenuous, rather they are pointing out that initially they saw a % decrease in tumor size that would make it a PR based on the RECIST criteria - but the patient dropped out due to other reasons and they did not get a chance to do a followup and confirm it.<

That is not how I understood their results. I understood that they defined unconfirmed as an patient who did have a 2nd scan but the original PR did not hold up.

From their data: The partial response included both confirmed and unconfirmed partial responses. In a confirmed partial response, partial response was maintained through a subsequent response assessment at least 28 days later, and in an unconfirmed partial response, the partial response was reported at one assessment but was not maintained in a subsequent response assessment.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.