Bebida Beverage Company (BBDA)

[huppo]

I think what everyone should be concerned about with the KOMA brand not being directly owned by the BBDA corporation, but instead by Daisy L. Ramirez Assoc, is that KOMA is being used to generate interest in BBDA and thereby sell shares or sustain/increase share price.

However, given BBDA and BW's assorted legal issues, should the corporation's assets be seized or a bankruptcy filed, etc, the KOMA brand would not be part of that since it isn't owned by BBDA. Potencia could then use and profit from the brand if it gets produced and distributed. Hence, the money you spent on BBDA shares goes down the toilet and you make nothing from the KOMA brand. Does anyone here seriously think BBDA isn't capable of that kind of bait-and-switch after reading the complaint about them hiding shares to avoid having to hand them over?

A poster claiming to be BW has some set of excuses why it's not owned by BBDA, but at this point I don't believe anything BW says about anything, if in fact those are even his words in the first place. The only concrete, provable info we have is that BW and BBDA are involved in a lawsuit regarding failure to meet a contractual requirement, apparently by means of deception.

I just think it's important for people to realize that if they think they are investing in KOMA when they put money into BBDA, they aren't. Just because the same people own DLR assoc and all three BBDAs and Potencia LLC and goodness only knows what else, doesn't mean they are automatically linked. in fact, people put assets in different legally defined entities for specific reasons. We've got an explanation from someone claiming to be BW, but his word isn't worth dirt, so I'd be inclined not to put any confidence in it whatsoever.

And by the way..kiefur...the word is "probably", not "proberbly".