InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 46
Posts 3467
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/21/2003

Re: barge post# 54090

Sunday, 09/26/2004 4:12:12 PM

Sunday, September 26, 2004 4:12:12 PM

Post# of 250081
it wasn't & if we did discuss this before, i did forget.

it might be hard for you to believe barge, but i don't commit yer posts to memory... of course, if i did, i'm confident that there would be dozens of bogus claims contained in some of the tens of thousands of HYPE posts over the years.

why didn't any wavoid bother to post anything about the Judge's Order that multiple Mass. class action claims against Wave were consolidated?

think Wave will be able to obtain a dismissal?

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

CANDY M. SOUSA,
Plaintiff

v.

WAVE SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL,
Defendants

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME;
MOTIONS TO CONSOLIDATE; MOTION TO APPOINT
COUNSEL AND MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO FILE

(Docket Nos. 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 18, 21, 23, 26, 28, 31, 41 & 42)

September 3, 2004

PONSOR, U.S.D.J.

Counsel for all parties appeared before this court for a
status conference and for hearing on pending motions on September 1, 2004. Based on counsel’s representations, the court orders as follows.

With regard to the Motion for Extension of Time (Docket No.8) the motion is hereby ALLOWED. Defendants may respond in accordance with the preliminary scheduling order set forth below.

With regard to the Motions to Consolidate (Docket Nos. 9,
10, 12, 13, 18, 21, 23, 26 & 31), they are hereby ALLOWED. The following cases are hereby ordered consolidated with this case:

Streicher v. Wave Systems Corporation, C.A. 04-30026-MAP, Dawod v. Wave Systems Corporation, C.A. 04-30029-MAP, Chess v. Wave Systems Corporation, C.A. 04-30037-MAP, Vicker v. Wave Systems Corporation, C.A. 04-30040-MAP, Bohman v. Wave Systems Corporation, C.A. 04-30041-MAP, Suo v. Wave Systems Corporation, C.A. 04-30042-MAP, and Schulman v. Wave Systems Corporation, C.A.

-2-

04-30043-MAP. In addition, a related case is now pending in the District of New Jersey, Trebitsch v. Wave Systems Corporation, 04-266-JCL. Should that case be transferred to this court, it will also be ordered consolidated with 04-30022-MAP. The seven cases specified above, upon consolidation with this case, may be closed.

The Motion to Appoint Lead and Liaison Counsel (Docket No. 28) is hereby ALLOWED. Lead counsel in this case will be Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP, Three Bala Plaza East, Suite 400, Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004. Liaison counsel will be Gilman & Pastor, LLP, Stonehill Corp. Center, 999 Broadway, Suite 500, Saugus, MA 01906.

Lead counsel and liaison counsel will be responsible for
communicating with the court on behalf of the proposed plaintiff class, and for insuring that copies of all court rulings and other relevant materials are distributed to counsel for the parties in all the consolidated cases.

The Motions for Leave to File (Docket Nos. 41 & 42) are
hereby ALLOWED.

Future proceedings in this case will unfold as follows:

1. On or before October 15, 2004 lead counsel for the
plaintiff will file an amended complaint and a motion
to amend the caption so that the case will be known as
Brumbaugh v. Wave Systems, C.A. 04-30022-MAP.

2. On or before November 30, 2004, defendants will
file their motion to dismiss.

3. Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion to dismiss
will be filed by January 15, 2005.

4. Any reply to the opposition will be filed by

-3-

February 8, 2005.

5. Counsel will appear again before this court for
argument on the motion to dismiss on February 16, 2005 at 2:00 p.m.

It is So Ordered.

/s/ Michael A. Ponsor
MICHAEL A. PONSOR
U. S. District Judge




Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.