Oh contrare yea of little faith or the capacity thereof to understand or comprehend.
Michigan alone is a $20 -$30 mil sales state for Badass. Everyone knows that when a company sees its sales go from $2 mil to $20 - $30 mil, or well over 1000% growth the stock will take off and fly.
When the bottles roll in the next 10 days, they will be on the shelves by the 15th. Distributor ramps and orders will quickly send those dist in MI from 15000 cases a month to 50000 cases a month because of the bottles. Not because of pie in the sky but because of the natural order of the beer biz. That's $10 mil in initial beer sales that easily doubles by year two. That is only 247000 Badass beer drinkers when 80000 already proved they are Badass drinkers. Easily triple that considering those that couldn't afford to see him but drink beer were not at his concerts. The rest couldn't get in because the shows were sold out or because of distance and expense.
Kid's fans were queried at his concert in MN and NY both on a random sampling. Only 2 out of 10 even know he has a beer. Not because of advertising but because of availability. On asked if they would buy his beer when available, 9 out of 10 said they would. On asked if it was good would they buy more of it and 8 out of 10 said absolutely if it was Kid's beer.
Take any 5 Kid Rock states and those 5 states WILL do a minimum of $20 million in sales to start. Any state only needs 18000 beer drinkers to latch onto Badass. That translates into 18 people at a local pub or grabbing a case at their local convenient store.
Now you have a brand producing an easy $200 million in sales where the company was only producing $2 million in sales, or a 10000% increase in sales. Stocks that see a 10000% increase in sales do go higher, and alot higher because quite frankly it doesn't happen very often and when it does, it's a rocket shot to the upside.
It's quite simple from there, and actually well beforehand, what to do. Ask AIG what they did. They took $180 BILLION from the taxpayers to stay afloat. Money they can NEVER recoup....ever. They REVERSED the stock and since it has been soaring. They bet on the derivatives market and their legalized gambling that led to most other's demise kept them here at all of our expense.
Reverse DKAM at 1 for 10 from here. But by then the stock will be $1 or $2 or $3. Now suddenly those "others" will be forced to shut the h*ll up for good. An OS of 100 mil suddenly becomes 10 mil. $200 mil in sales returns a minimum $60 mil gross profit on an average 30% gross margin. Should DKAM return a MINIMUM, but it will be more, net profit of $20 mil, then the earnings per share will be $2.00 MINIMUM per share. Stocks with a 10000% rate of growth don't support a paltry P/E of 20 or 30. They usually are well over 100. Even HANS, the Granddaddy of them all was averaging between 70-100 P/E on its run.
But for the sake of argument, we'll not get too exuberant and go with a minimum 30 P/E and that takes the stock to $60 on a $2.00 EPS MINIMUM. Perhaps $140 on a 70 PE.
Not so big a reverse? Doesn't matter. 1 for 5 returns the same thing and puts the OS where HANS was. At this point, there still won't be anybody to say a word about the OS and there won't be any more issuing shares. 20 mil OS returns a MINIMUM of $1.00 a share earnings. A $10 share price that is trading well below THE INDUSTRY STANDARD OF A MINIMUM $30 a share 30 PE. But of course, at a growth rate that makes HANS appear like a dwarf, you could easily see $50-$80 a share.
These aren't made up numbers. This is reality. This isn't double talk or pumping. It is what the market does. This is what analysts do. And by then it will have drowned out anybody who has a comment to the contrary...especially those that say never or "What about me? I don't own a share but you simply must listen to me tell everyone why this will never happen." Pretty laughable when it just did.
