Tuesday, September 21, 2004 8:00:25 PM
that's wavoid wording Snack
yes i read the article -- i posted it. the article actually noted that according to a C/Net article, Dell & HP may use NSM I/O technology.
wavoids magically turn that into will use the technology.
misc:
nope, not smoking anything.
nope, don't own any wavx.
nope, not looking to buy it.
my oft stated precursors to ever owning wavx again have not been established & there is presently no publicly available indication that i'm aware of, which suggests those items turning in favor of owning it.
i am able to see certain inklings that Wave might begin to realize some revs, but it is nowhere near the scope of the projected revs that were part of the "ubiquity" slogan of prior biz models & IMO it is much more niche than world dominion.
& it doesn't change a panoply of other adverse issues that IMO are ignored too often by too many.
IMO Wave might be poised to muddle along, but cash flow positive is years away (if ever) despite the proclamations & recants of breakeven steven.
despite the various trading opportunities which may or may not exist w/wavx, the "recipe for $0.50" still exists IMO & delisting is a far bigger fundamental business issue than some here will ever acknowledge.
anyway, my prior post should indicate to some that i do have the ability to see the other side of the story, though it doesn't contain the magnitude IMO that it does in others' opinions.
yeah shute, we disagree on a great many things, including the use of a preposition at the end of a sentence!
ciao!
yes i read the article -- i posted it. the article actually noted that according to a C/Net article, Dell & HP may use NSM I/O technology.
wavoids magically turn that into will use the technology.
misc:
nope, not smoking anything.
nope, don't own any wavx.
nope, not looking to buy it.
my oft stated precursors to ever owning wavx again have not been established & there is presently no publicly available indication that i'm aware of, which suggests those items turning in favor of owning it.
i am able to see certain inklings that Wave might begin to realize some revs, but it is nowhere near the scope of the projected revs that were part of the "ubiquity" slogan of prior biz models & IMO it is much more niche than world dominion.
& it doesn't change a panoply of other adverse issues that IMO are ignored too often by too many.
IMO Wave might be poised to muddle along, but cash flow positive is years away (if ever) despite the proclamations & recants of breakeven steven.
despite the various trading opportunities which may or may not exist w/wavx, the "recipe for $0.50" still exists IMO & delisting is a far bigger fundamental business issue than some here will ever acknowledge.
anyway, my prior post should indicate to some that i do have the ability to see the other side of the story, though it doesn't contain the magnitude IMO that it does in others' opinions.
yeah shute, we disagree on a great many things, including the use of a preposition at the end of a sentence!
ciao!
Join the InvestorsHub Community
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
