InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 17
Posts 2691
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/17/2007

Re: BCInvestor post# 37397

Friday, 08/14/2009 5:50:33 AM

Friday, August 14, 2009 5:50:33 AM

Post# of 86719
Apparently so considering it still appears LIQR never paid any $$$ to DKAM and they filed for monies not paid in marketing cost that spanned longer than their entire agreement with DKAM. If I look more closely, I bet they are trying to get money out of DKAM for services before LIQR was even a publicly traded company. It would seem about right for them to given their track record. 101 finds it highly suspect when somebody jumps up knowing all about how much DKAM actually shipped to LIQR when it was never published anywhere. And further, one finds it highly suspect when that amount of $200K also finds some $90K or so of DKAM products sitting in a bailment warehouse not being delivered to customers that LIQR seized and took control claiming default. If LIQR supposedly received $200K of product and claim they were due another $800K in products that were never shipped, then why is $90K sitting blindly in a warehouse waiting to be stolen by LIQR? A matter for another day. Speaking of which, it is a clear and concise SEC violation for any member of the media in any regard to contact any publicly traded company and/or write any articles or report on any company thereon without first abiding by rules of Fair Disclosure that said member of the media is a shareholder in the company they are reporting about in any fashion. Ooops! That ends that.