InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 56
Posts 9858
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 12/12/2008

Re: underdog150 post# 157186

Tuesday, 08/04/2009 5:38:57 PM

Tuesday, August 04, 2009 5:38:57 PM

Post# of 346917
There are a few issues, One the law firm representing the old TA doesn't know where it came from...

two the opinion letter would have been thrown out most likely, the only reason action in any regard was taken because someone called up the TA and asked them about the said letters.. (kinda odd dont you think) that someone would know about a letter that hasn't been acted upon.

Further, they were never signed... and the law firm that they came from is a fake one.. which leads me to believe that someone was trying to pull a fast one...

As Old Tymer stated when he called the TA they would not even look twice at such a letter... Most likely they called or tried to contact this fake law firm, and found it was a fake and threw away the letter..

to later find out that someone called them about the letter... and that's where things got interesting, that person goaded them into contacting the SEC about the matter, however if you read the letter made available by these same individuals (how they got is interesting as they were most likely CC'd on it because they were the ones calling the TA about these letters) but if you read the letter it clearly states that the TA doesn't know where these letters have come from...

Very odd to me...

Everything I say is in my own opinion do not buy sell or hold based off what I have to say.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.