InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,615.35
(
0.55%
)
US TECH 100
19,882.80
(
0.45%
)
Dow Jones
40,000.90
(
0.62%
)
Brent Oil
84.38
(
-0.26%
)
Bitcoin
62,497.13
(
2.84%
)
Post# of 30387
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Gold Seeker

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 29
Posts 9421
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/30/2006

Gold Seeker

Re: opportunityknocking post# 21278

Tuesday, 08/04/2009 9:43:06 AM

Tuesday, August 04, 2009 9:43:06 AM

Post# of 30387
Opportunity stated: "A medical misdiagnosis may be the result of medical malpractice when:

• Early detection tests are not ordered because of cost considerations
• A Doctor hastily offers a diagnosis without a proper medical evaluation
• A Doctor fails to order necessary tests to help diagnose or rule out cancer"

Tell me then, Why are doctors not being sued for failure to administer DR-70 tests? It is FDA approved.

Tell me, Why are doctors not being sued for failure to use the Panacea HaaH test? It is available and would detect cancer.

Failure to do what is expected of a doctor is malpractice. Even if RECAF was approved, it may never sell. DR-70 has been FDA approved for over a year and it is not selling.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up