Thursday, July 23, 2009 6:28:31 PM
Of course you could get in trouble for publishing fake news, but, isn't that jumping several steps ahead to conclusions, and pretty extreme ones?
Come on, the item in question is, after all, barely news. I don't understand why people expect a PR on this necessarily. Or then jump to the conclusion that she could be making it up. And then argue she's legally required to answer the question. And this could be libel. And ... yeah, understand why she took a swing at that post since it does sound a little nutty.
Glidelogic Corp. Announces Revolutionary AI-Generated Content Copyright Protection Solution • GDLG • Jul 26, 2024 12:30 PM
Southern Silver Files NI43-101 Technical Report for its Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Cerro Las Minitas Project • SSV • Jul 25, 2024 8:00 AM
Greenlite Ventures Completes Agreement with No Limit Technology • GRNL • Jul 19, 2024 10:00 AM
VAYK Expects Revenue from First Airbnb Property Starting from August • VAYK • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Acquires Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California, with Assays up to 4.8 oz. Au per Ton • NBRI • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Signs Letter of Intent for All-Stock Acquisition of CarryOutSupplies.com • NGTF • Jul 17, 2024 1:00 PM