NeoMedia Technologies, Inc (NEOM)

[srowen]

I don't believe she's said anything like she can't or won't furnish the source if legally required, but, did anybody suggest there is a legal reason to compel this?

Of course you could get in trouble for publishing fake news, but, isn't that jumping several steps ahead to conclusions, and pretty extreme ones?

Come on, the item in question is, after all, barely news. I don't understand why people expect a PR on this necessarily. Or then jump to the conclusion that she could be making it up. And then argue she's legally required to answer the question. And this could be libel. And ... yeah, understand why she took a swing at that post since it does sound a little nutty.