InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 131
Posts 8294
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/26/2001

Re: VERITAS77 post# 23177

Tuesday, 07/21/2009 9:28:37 AM

Tuesday, July 21, 2009 9:28:37 AM

Post# of 364628
It is little long but interesting, Why CAT does not have loss.

PEORIA, Ill., July 21 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Caterpillar Inc. today reported a second-quarter profit of $0.60 per share, down $1.14 per share from the second quarter of 2008. Excluding redundancy costs, profit was $0.72 per share. Redundancy costs related to reducing employment were $85 million before tax or $0.12 per share in the quarter. Sales and revenues of $7.975 billion were down 41 percent from $13.624 billion in the second quarter 2008.

Uh, make that the 40% club.

The second-quarter profit of $371 million was down $735 million from $1.106 billion in the second quarter of 2008. The decline was largely a result of lower sales volume and $85 million of redundancy costs. These negative impacts were partially offset by lower Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A) and Research and Development (R&D) expenses, favorable price realization, LIFO inventory decrement benefits and a lower tax rate.

Watch that LIFO; it can burn you hard down the road.

The street loved it; the futures moved about a half-percent on the release and CAT's stock is up $4 pre-market, more than 10%.

Oh, and if you're wondering how in the devil you can turn in these sorts of numbers with this kind of top-line, here's part of the reason:

Utilizing the Caterpillar Production System (CPS) with 6 Sigma, the company reduced inventory in the second quarter by more than $800 million, and through the first half of the year inventory has declined by more than $1.6 billion.

In other words they already paid for the $800 million of "stuff" building it in previous quarters (and recorded the costs of doing so) and now they've sold it, so this quarter it has a COGS (cost of goods sold) of zero and the entire $800 million goes straight to the bottom line.

That works out well for this quarter and makes for a hell of a beat. Indeed, absent this inventory sell-down the company would have posted more than a $400 million dollar loss!

And once again we get a lesson in how revenues (down 41%) hit profits (down 735 million from 1.106 billion), and the "profit" they made was only due to selling already-built stuff! That is, absent that extra inventory they had available to sell that decline in revenues was more than enough to tip the company into a sizable loss.

Source: http://market-ticker.denninger.net/archives/1242-Another-30%25-Club-Member-CAT-Also-KO-UTX.html

Farooq
This post is for educational and amusement purposes only, and is not to be interpreted as trading advice. Consult your financial adviser before placing any trade.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=4514

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.