InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 253
Posts 2747
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/15/2006

Re: dmceng post# 81144

Monday, 07/13/2009 1:54:09 PM

Monday, July 13, 2009 1:54:09 PM

Post# of 730288
Its not just delay tactics. It is desperation tactics. JPM has probably told the attorneys to get JPM out of this mess (the discovery in particular) or lose JPM as a client. Attorneys should refrain from pxssing off any judge. If the judge thought her decision was a close call she could have made it a final order so JPM could have appealed without a motion. She didn't. That says a lot. She will probably deny the motion forthwith. Judges are arrogant sob's. They don't like to be told what to do or that they did wrong. Who wants to be reviewed? If she denies the motion, the case moves forward and perhaps settled with no appeal whatsoever. Its actually in her best interest to deny the motion. Doing so only delays the appeal . In the event it goes to trial to final adjudication JPM can then appeal it. I am glad to see the holding company going after sanctions.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News