InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 414
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/03/2008

Re: Chiron post# 76891

Tuesday, 06/16/2009 3:30:30 PM

Tuesday, June 16, 2009 3:30:30 PM

Post# of 729594
Co-mingled funds is not relative to the argument at hand. On the contrary, It's an attempt by JPM's council to wriggle out of the suit. The co-mingling of funds occurred after the fact. Did people actually expect JPM to say..."oh gee, you caught us red handed" and hand over the booty? I don't think so. Co-mingling the aftermath of the robbery is what JPM now hopes to confuse the courts with. Judge Walrath is not amused I'm sure.

Consider for a moment the impact of the Judges decisions in this case. This case isn't about a BK pink sheet company. This case is about the private American Central Banking System cannibalizing one American Icon for the benefit of another American Icon. The decision was hastily conceived and executed behind closed doors without regard to shareholder or the publics best interest.

I'm not worried about minor (trader) pps fluctuations here because the upcoming Judge's rulings will affect the pps far more than any PR put out by any pink sheet CEO. Based on my DD, I will just accumulate and hold.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News