pitbull, I'm happy to read that the words "reality" and "realistic" are an important part of your GTEL-lexicon. In that regard, could you please explain how the term "rs" (reverse split) is "bs"? Isn't a reverse split just one of many stock market machinations that take place from time-to-time, from the Pink Sheets to the NYSE? While a "rs" might not be a welcomed-sight for investors, the procedure is nonetheless very real, and very much a part of investing in the stock market. Since you enjoy reading posts on both the pros and cons of your investment (GTEL), how can you tell "henn" that "reality" and "realistic" is good, then in almost the same breath say "please refrain from the rs bs here"? With GTEL's large OS that accompanies their sub-$1 pps, the argument for a "rs" in the future, while not shareholder-friendly, is still a very "realistic" argument that deals with what might become "reality" somewhere down the road (management has never-said-NEVER to the possibility of a future "rs"). Reverse split or not, "henn's" mention of the term deals very much with potential "reality", and is hardly "bs". Some posters don't enjoy reading "herd", while you don't enjoy reading about "rs". While you're welcome to join the crowd (message likes/dislikes), your attempt to differentiate "reality" from "bs" failed miserably. Ciao
