InvestorsHub Logo

sf

Followers 33
Posts 1283
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/25/2008

sf

Re: Large Green post# 75537

Saturday, 06/06/2009 8:44:21 AM

Saturday, June 06, 2009 8:44:21 AM

Post# of 734345
people are forgetting this. i dont feel they are in it to merge. they are in it to get their money for their banks and patent infringement done by jpm using the design patent owned by wmi. they want to clear their name because reputation is everything. it is in jpm best interest to give them an offer they cant refuse. it is in jpm best interest to merge wmi as a subsidiary holding company and payout the monies owed to them for the bank stock. wmi doesnt need jpm jpm needs them. i feel when the 4.4 bil is returned that is enough capital to come out of bk irreguardless of bank outcome. any bank could be bought and NOLs remain intact. and wm returns to its rightful place and is stiff competition for gs and jpm. because wmi will definitely be the only "good" bank and holding company with a true clear balance sheet. a force to be reckoned with. the ball is in jpm court. i feel there will be a huge bidding war for wmb because a true auction was not done and gs needs to grow. they will not just let jaime dimon walk off with the prize. i think this is going to be very eye opening experience for everyone involved. we are the prize and the competition they wanted eliminated. but i dont feel wmi will be eliminated or silenced. they will return imo. would wmi have to buy a brick and mortar bank to come out of bk with NOL's? could they in fact have a digital online bank? they have atms that are owned by them now offsite of the banks in malls and airports. why couldnt they be a holding company with an online banking system. no overhead and they could offer an unbelievable savings rate and cd rates to depositors that jpm and gs could not! something to ponder!!!
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News