d indian Thursday, 06/04/09 05:28:54 PM Re: Zorax post# 8150 Post # of 16741 KITT, think the poster meant, 'a public company should not have the responsibility of furnishing the thief, to help scam the user's out of their money'. Don't believe any kind of 'disclaimer' can protect a company from that. And yes, according to the 'indictments', IHUB AND MATT have been very detrimental to investor's bank accounts. Thanks for bringing it up. Indian SCION'S POST about the people got fined, mirrors the very same problem that MATT has brought to IHUB. Looks like IHUB'S ADMINISTRATION, may have engaged in the same type, hear no evil, see no evil, turn their heads, bury their heads in the sand concerning one of their own. Don't look good. Hope they [ADMIN]don't say nothing. Self incriminating evidence is the worst kind.