Monday, August 16, 2004 10:27:55 PM
guvna - re thinly veiled spin
if the NSM bundling deal being unwound was such a great thing for Wave as a few voids recently proclaimed (speciously IMO), why didn't Wave trumpet the "news" & why did SKS a_void it during the CC?
if this supposed 4x the money for the same amount of work version is to be believed, then why was it swept under the rug until the noted Wave gadfly 5par posted it on yahoo! & then Doma brought it over here for consumption?
why was Wave's communication on this issue: 1) buried in 10Q discussion; and 2) an after-the-fact e-mail reply from SKS espousing the 4x the money for the same amount of work theory.
reminds me of the infamous breakeven stevenspeak claiming Wave would be at or near breakeven by mid to late 2004 (which was then redefinied as generating revs equal to the then current burn rate, w/substantially increased expenses by the time that cash-flow was generated).
it is "mid to late 2004" right now & Wave generated a whopping $6k -- no room to weasel outta that one!
Snack likes to post "watch the volume," but when the really big volume does come, it just might be too late to salvage much if anything & some voids seem to think it is a badge of honor if they lose it all... all in the name of Sprague.
good luck!
if the NSM bundling deal being unwound was such a great thing for Wave as a few voids recently proclaimed (speciously IMO), why didn't Wave trumpet the "news" & why did SKS a_void it during the CC?
if this supposed 4x the money for the same amount of work version is to be believed, then why was it swept under the rug until the noted Wave gadfly 5par posted it on yahoo! & then Doma brought it over here for consumption?
why was Wave's communication on this issue: 1) buried in 10Q discussion; and 2) an after-the-fact e-mail reply from SKS espousing the 4x the money for the same amount of work theory.
reminds me of the infamous breakeven stevenspeak claiming Wave would be at or near breakeven by mid to late 2004 (which was then redefinied as generating revs equal to the then current burn rate, w/substantially increased expenses by the time that cash-flow was generated).
it is "mid to late 2004" right now & Wave generated a whopping $6k -- no room to weasel outta that one!
Snack likes to post "watch the volume," but when the really big volume does come, it just might be too late to salvage much if anything & some voids seem to think it is a badge of honor if they lose it all... all in the name of Sprague.
good luck!
Join the InvestorsHub Community
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
