InvestorsHub Logo

upc

Followers 0
Posts 316
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/21/2004

upc

Re: sgolds post# 42199

Friday, 08/13/2004 6:00:08 PM

Friday, August 13, 2004 6:00:08 PM

Post# of 97586
Not necessarily. If 65nm has a much higher likelihood of delays, poor yields, etc., i.e. higher risks, then the conclusion is unclear, and going with 90nm first might make sense.

upc
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMD News